Gorr the God-Butcher is the hero of the story

 I have never in my life related to a fictional character so hard as I did to Gorr in the moment when he met his god and found him to be worse than worthless. Gorr's renunciation of his god is exactly what I felt when I renounced mine:

If somehow he existed, the bastard accepted my praise but refused my prayers. He accepted my sacrifices but refused my pleas for help. He had the power to fix the shit he fucked up but couldn't be bothered. He made me give up pleasures and endure pains in this life with an empty promise that he'd make up for it in the next. When I asked for mercy, or even acknowledgement of my suffering, the response was contempt and dismissal. If my god had really existed, and had a physical form that could be attacked, I'd have taken the sword and beheaded him too.

Gorr is RIGHT. If gods existed that made demands and commandments without ever bothering to help those that needed them: then they would deserve obliteration, not worship. The only way the writers could make Gorr a villian for the purpose of the story was to have him kidnap a bunch of children. Otherwise, he would be unambiguously the hero, the guy to root for 100%. Even in the movie's universe where Thor is a pretty decent guy (after millennia of being not-that) - Thor finally getting off his ass and doing something to help those less powerful than himself doesn't justify allowing the continued existence of all the other gods that don't.

But in the real world, the Necrosword isn't some evil, sentient force that holds malice against the selfish and indifferent gods. In this world, the god-killer is simply the double-edged blade of facts and logic. No god can survive it. Maybe the fatal stroke is the problem of evil, as it was for me; maybe it's the inconsistencies between the various contradictory commandments of any given religion's scriptures; maybe it's the simple absence of evidence FOR a god; but no god can withstand a person being honest with themselves about the question of the god's existence. No god can stand up to the test of logic and evidence, and no god that fails the test would deserve worship. 

Take up the sword.

Kill them all.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Baby in the bathwater?

Image
A Christian minister asked a Christian president, who was elected by Christians for Christian reasons, to behave in accordance with Christian principles. And yet, the majority of the country's Christians are mad about it. And despite that, the rest of the nation's Christians continue to insist that there's a "real" Christianity that somehow the majority of Christians are failing to practice despite the fact that those Christians make their whole personality about how Christian they are. The decent humans that still adhere to Christianity - who are very much the minority of Christians - continue to believe that Christianity has an actual moral core and a message that can make its adherents behave in a more moral way. They continue to tell me that there's a baby I've thrown out with the bathwater by rejecting Christianity in its entirety.  And I get it. I used to think the same, for decades. I would "no true Scotsman" every Christian who behaved im...
Read more

On Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Evangelical Republicans, and Judas Iscariot

Earlier today, I posted this on Facebook: "Tonight, for Maundy Thursday, Christians all over the world will commemorate a time when an innocent man who had done nothing more than criticize people in power was imprisoned and ultimately executed without due process, due in large part to a mob of religious people demanding his destruction and claiming he was a danger to the rule of the emperor. And 80 percent of American Evangelicals will never, EVER realize that they are the Judas in this story." But on further reflection, I realized that this was unnecessarily harsh and insulting. ... ...to Judas. After all, Judas realized almost immediately that he had done something monstrous, something unforgiveable, and felt such remorse at the enormity of his betrayal that he could no longer live with himself. But Evangelical Republicans lack the moral clarity of JUDAS FUCKING ISCARIOT. No, they're something far worse. They're the crowd chanting "Crucify him!" and "...
Read more

A matter of principle

Ever since November of 2016, the question has haunted me: How did the conservative Evangelicals I grew up with so thoroughly lose their principles? And the correct answer is: They never had principles.  But for once, I don't intend that as an insult. I mean this as a distinction between two different ways of looking at morality. Evangelicals never had principles; they had RULES. Because that's how their churches train them to think. They (along with the Catholics, who have fallen into the same error) are religious fundamentalists. They don't treat morality as a set of flexible guidelines that can and should change over time; they treat morality as a set of rules that are "the same yesterday, today, and forever". If the Bible said it in 2000 BCE, then it's still binding 4 millennia later (except if there's another rule that negates it, such as the "no bacon" thing being negated by Peter's vision in Acts).  But there wasn't a "That wa...
Read more