Sexualizing Communion

Apparently, some Christians are mad at Machine Gun Kelley and Megan Fox for "sexualizing Communion" by taking pics of themselves with him dressed as a priest and her kneeling in bondage gear while he feeds her bread and holds a goblet of wine.


I just think it's worth pointing out that in the Bible, immediately after Jesus gives his disciples the bread and wine and we have that famous scene where he says "This is my body and blood, given for you; eat this in remembrance of me..." IMMEDIATELY after that the following scene happens: 

Jesus: *Strips down* Okay, boys, I'mma wash y'all's feet now.

Peter: DUDE, I am NOT comfortable with this.

Jesus: Bro, you gotta, otherwise you can't be in a relationship with me.

Peter: Fine, then, wash me ALL OVER. I'm a DIRTY BOY.

Jesus: Nah bro, just the feet, we're good with just the feet.

Jesus: Except Judas, he's still a dirty, dirty boy. 

Judas: *leaves* Hey temple cops, I'll kiss the guy you need to arrest.

Jesus: Bro, you betray me with a kiss? Really? 


And then Pilate has him stripped down again and whipped so everyone can watch.


... But Megan Fox is the one making this weird and sexual.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Baby in the bathwater?

Image
A Christian minister asked a Christian president, who was elected by Christians for Christian reasons, to behave in accordance with Christian principles. And yet, the majority of the country's Christians are mad about it. And despite that, the rest of the nation's Christians continue to insist that there's a "real" Christianity that somehow the majority of Christians are failing to practice despite the fact that those Christians make their whole personality about how Christian they are. The decent humans that still adhere to Christianity - who are very much the minority of Christians - continue to believe that Christianity has an actual moral core and a message that can make its adherents behave in a more moral way. They continue to tell me that there's a baby I've thrown out with the bathwater by rejecting Christianity in its entirety.  And I get it. I used to think the same, for decades. I would "no true Scotsman" every Christian who behaved im...
Read more

On Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Evangelical Republicans, and Judas Iscariot

Earlier today, I posted this on Facebook: "Tonight, for Maundy Thursday, Christians all over the world will commemorate a time when an innocent man who had done nothing more than criticize people in power was imprisoned and ultimately executed without due process, due in large part to a mob of religious people demanding his destruction and claiming he was a danger to the rule of the emperor. And 80 percent of American Evangelicals will never, EVER realize that they are the Judas in this story." But on further reflection, I realized that this was unnecessarily harsh and insulting. ... ...to Judas. After all, Judas realized almost immediately that he had done something monstrous, something unforgiveable, and felt such remorse at the enormity of his betrayal that he could no longer live with himself. But Evangelical Republicans lack the moral clarity of JUDAS FUCKING ISCARIOT. No, they're something far worse. They're the crowd chanting "Crucify him!" and "...
Read more

A matter of principle

Ever since November of 2016, the question has haunted me: How did the conservative Evangelicals I grew up with so thoroughly lose their principles? And the correct answer is: They never had principles.  But for once, I don't intend that as an insult. I mean this as a distinction between two different ways of looking at morality. Evangelicals never had principles; they had RULES. Because that's how their churches train them to think. They (along with the Catholics, who have fallen into the same error) are religious fundamentalists. They don't treat morality as a set of flexible guidelines that can and should change over time; they treat morality as a set of rules that are "the same yesterday, today, and forever". If the Bible said it in 2000 BCE, then it's still binding 4 millennia later (except if there's another rule that negates it, such as the "no bacon" thing being negated by Peter's vision in Acts).  But there wasn't a "That wa...
Read more