Marvel Jesus

 




*Deadpool/ Wolverine spoilers ahead*



No really, this will spoil the entire plot of the film if you haven't seen it yet, DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE.




Okay, you were warned. Be it upon thine own head.


Jesus and Deadpool. What a pair. One is a fictional character loosely based on a real person, a loudmouthed iconoclast who pisses off authority figures and hangs out with sex workers and willingly gives his life to save the world then comes back to life... and so is the other.

You know what's funny about Evangelicals being mad at Deadpool over the "Marvel Jesus" thing?
If they thought about it for a second, they'd realize it's actually complimentary to Jesus.
Deadpool is saying that he strives to be the kind of man willing to endure torture and death in order to save his friends. That is the one thing he could do to feel like he matters - despite having already done lots of heroic things, THIS is the image of a true hero to him.

In other words, in this movie, Jesus is the hero that even superheroes aspire to be like. If Evangelicals thought about it for a second, they would realize how badass that makes their god look.

But of course, if they were capable of thinking about something for even a second, they wouldn't BE Evangelicals.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Baby in the bathwater?

Image
A Christian minister asked a Christian president, who was elected by Christians for Christian reasons, to behave in accordance with Christian principles. And yet, the majority of the country's Christians are mad about it. And despite that, the rest of the nation's Christians continue to insist that there's a "real" Christianity that somehow the majority of Christians are failing to practice despite the fact that those Christians make their whole personality about how Christian they are. The decent humans that still adhere to Christianity - who are very much the minority of Christians - continue to believe that Christianity has an actual moral core and a message that can make its adherents behave in a more moral way. They continue to tell me that there's a baby I've thrown out with the bathwater by rejecting Christianity in its entirety.  And I get it. I used to think the same, for decades. I would "no true Scotsman" every Christian who behaved im...
Read more

On Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Evangelical Republicans, and Judas Iscariot

Earlier today, I posted this on Facebook: "Tonight, for Maundy Thursday, Christians all over the world will commemorate a time when an innocent man who had done nothing more than criticize people in power was imprisoned and ultimately executed without due process, due in large part to a mob of religious people demanding his destruction and claiming he was a danger to the rule of the emperor. And 80 percent of American Evangelicals will never, EVER realize that they are the Judas in this story." But on further reflection, I realized that this was unnecessarily harsh and insulting. ... ...to Judas. After all, Judas realized almost immediately that he had done something monstrous, something unforgiveable, and felt such remorse at the enormity of his betrayal that he could no longer live with himself. But Evangelical Republicans lack the moral clarity of JUDAS FUCKING ISCARIOT. No, they're something far worse. They're the crowd chanting "Crucify him!" and "...
Read more

A matter of principle

Ever since November of 2016, the question has haunted me: How did the conservative Evangelicals I grew up with so thoroughly lose their principles? And the correct answer is: They never had principles.  But for once, I don't intend that as an insult. I mean this as a distinction between two different ways of looking at morality. Evangelicals never had principles; they had RULES. Because that's how their churches train them to think. They (along with the Catholics, who have fallen into the same error) are religious fundamentalists. They don't treat morality as a set of flexible guidelines that can and should change over time; they treat morality as a set of rules that are "the same yesterday, today, and forever". If the Bible said it in 2000 BCE, then it's still binding 4 millennia later (except if there's another rule that negates it, such as the "no bacon" thing being negated by Peter's vision in Acts).  But there wasn't a "That wa...
Read more